Students Notes

Disha

Library Database

jstor cmie eric open database cochrane librarymanupatramanupatrajstor


[PDF]

INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR

ON

Mind, Brain and Consciousness

| How to Prepare Abstracts |

| Abstracts Accepted |


Topics for the Seminar


Topics for the Workshops


Honorary International Advisory Board

About The Seminar

Mind, Brain and Consciousness

Introduction

Purpose

Mind and Consciousness

The Brain

Workshops

The Goal, And Bridging the Gap


Programme and Speakers

Seminar Details

Registration Fees

Registration Form

[ HTML ] [ PDF ]


Contact Us

About Us

Accommodation


Pre-seminar lecture

Abstract Accepted


Bridging the Gap between Philosophers of Mind and Brain Researchers

Christi an Perring*

Abstract

Philosophers and psychologists have long tried to understand people's irrational behavior, through concepts such as weakness of will, compulsion, and addiction.   The scientific basis of the project has been greatly enhanced by advances in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.  However, some philosophers have also been critical of the more general conclusions drawn by the scientists.  This is especially true when scientific researchers start making claims that go to philosophical issues, such as free will and responsibility.  Conversely, some scientists have been critical of philosophical approaches for not understanding the results of recent research.   I examine some of the recent history of scientific claims about addiction, and the rise of the claims from scientists to have shown that addiction is a brain disease and that addictive behavior is compulsive.  Given the well-confirmed evidence that addicts can modulate their behavior in response to rewards, punishments, and context, it is clear that according to normal definitions of compulsivity, the behavior of addicts is not typically compulsive, which suggests neuroscientists are making an error in their interpretation of data.  Since philosophers have expertise in making distinctions between different kinds of action and categorizing them as free, weak-willed, and compulsive, we will achieve a better interpretation of the neuroscience of addiction when taking this philosophical work into account.  Conversely, given the status of science in the modern world, philosophers have to grapple with the latest neuroscientific discoveries and to show the compatibility of their philosophical theories with the data for their approaches to maintain credibility. 

Keywords: Neuroscience; Addiction; Philosophy; Action theory; Compulsion
………………………………………
Ph.D. Dowling College, New York, USA.
Correspondence: Dept Philosophy, Dowling College, 150 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY 11769, USA
Email: cperring@yahoo.com

 

 Int Seminar MBC, Jan 2010. Accepted